most popular online casinos most reputable online casinos best online blackjack casino best online blackjack sites slot machines real money best slots for real money american casinos american casinos online casinos payouts online casinos that payout best casino promotions online casino promotion codes
May 05

Beam profile in one of Mordechai Segev's 2D photonic crystal lattices. The transverse disorder increases from c) to e). From Schwartz, Segev et al

This post originally appeared on Jim’s Cleo Blog and is reproduced with permission from its author.

This year’s CLEO plenary sessions were exceptional. Monday evening hosted talks by Donald Keck, who pioneered the first low-loss optical fiber and James Fujimoto, renown for developing optical coherence tomography. Wednesday morning’s plenary followed with exhilarating work (I’m serious, not just blogger hyperbole here) on photonic crystals. Even the awards were exciting. Amnon Yariv, responsible for the creation of the distributed feedback laser, and whose book “Optical Electronics in Modern Communication,” I safeguard as one of the most helpful optics texts on my shelf, was presented with the 2011 IEEE Photonics Award. In his acceptance speech, he spoke briefly of his emigration to the United States from Israel 60 years ago. The freighter that carried him, other passengers, and iron ore across the Atlantic, made entry in none other than the city of Baltimore. Yariv, reminisced about his first meal after landing in a gritty, industrial, 1950s Baltimore-a ham sandwich (his first ever)!

After the awards, the plenary speakers Mordechai (Moti) Segev and Susumu Noda spoke about their respective work on photonic crystals. Segev, a charismatic speaker, setup a beautiful story addressing a fundamental understanding of periodic and random structures via photonic lattices. He specifically spoke about work on Anderson Localization of Photons, the optical analog to Anderson’s Theory for Localization of electron’s in a crystal lattice. By introducing disorder into a 2D photonic lattice, Segev was able to constructively interfere light over a small area, and destructively interfere light everywhere else. Diffraction is thwarted, analogous to how diffusion is thwarted by the interference of electron waves for Anderson Localization in a crystal lattice (see figure above). Check out Frank Kuo’s February 26, blogpost with more details describing this work.

Segev’s group of course has pushed this work further, and into stranger directions. In contrast to confinement, Segev’s group found that they could make a beam expand faster than diffraction, hyper-transport. One reason this work is so beautiful is that the theory and phenomena for photonic lattices can be borrowed from crystal lattices in condensed matter and visa-versa. The equations are the same, you just need to change the variables and some good creativity. In 2008, Roati et al leveraged work from Anderson Localization in photonic lattices to demonstrate Anderson Localization for the first time using matter waves. This makes me wonder about a designing a crystal structure with say hyper-diffusion? With a sharp mind and good imagination, the possibilities seem endless.

Segev does a fantastic job framing his work romantically. Though the devices his group makes have great practical implications, it is all through the guise of exploring the nature of world. Segev helps remind us why we became interested in science in the first place, for the thrill of exploration and finding answers, to generate new questions, and to pursue things because they are beautiful.

Segev was a tough act to follow, but Noda came through. After Segev’s nice setup, Noda showed one impressive photonic crystal device after the other. Here is a list of some of the groundbreaking devices he has made:

-Nano-cavities with Q > 40,000
-Inhibition of spontaneous emission
-Light that can make right angle turns
-Slowing or stopping light with probe pulses
-Novel gates for quantum computing
-Small beam-steering devices
-High-efficiency, high power single wavelength emitters
-Creation of unique beam patterns for applications like optical trapping of non-dielectric particles
-Sub-wavelength focusing of beams
-Thermal emission control (shaping and redistribution of blackbody spectra)

Again, for details on the physics behind some of these devices, see Frank Kuo’s February 26, blogpost. I left this plenary session inspired, ready to get into the lab to get some work done, and strangely with the craving for a Baltimore ham sandwich. For the original post, click here.

Apr 17
This post originally appeared on CLEO 2011 by Frank Kuo and is reproduced with permission from its author.

In the last blog, we took a trip starting from quantum Zeno effect and reached to one of its applications — all-optical switch — at a quick pace. This time, we will look into more phenomena that researchers use in order to achieve this all-optical switch future.

We discussed about photonic crystals (PCs) and their versatility in a recent blog. We learned that by changing the patterns of the PCs, it is able to select which color of light that can travel within it or be rejected. While the patterns play the crucial role in PCs, we have to realize that it is the modulation of the refractive index produced by the patterns that give PCs their unique physical properties. With this being said, it is not difficult to understand that if the refractive index of the material that PCs are made of can be changed, we are able to affect (or tune) PCs’ properties. This is exactly what researchers are trying to do recently:

Considering the silicon PC shown in figure 1a, there are two colors of light allowed to propagate in it (mode c and mode s). Now, it is known that putting some free electrons in the conduction band of Si would change its refractive index. To use this feature, researchers shine this PC with some light (pump) such that a few electrons in the Si can be kicked to the conduction band. Changing the refractive index shifts the center frequencies of mode c and mode s directly. In addition, since PC is so sensitive to its refractive index, just a few hundred fJ of energy is required to tune the transmittance property of the PC. The all-optical switch is then realized by the following: Let’s input two colors of light into the PC — one is very close to mode s and one is right at mode s (figure 1b). Without the additional pumping light, mode s is transmitted. With the pump, mode s is suppressed and the other color now is able to transmit since the transmittance property is shifted. So by pump-on/pump on, we will have different colors of light coming out — an all-optical switch, as we expect.

Figure 1. an all-optical switch based on a silicon PC. (a) The structure and the transmittance curve of this specific PC. (b) with/without pump, the transmittance of the PC is shifted. Here we use mode s as an example. Courtesy of T. Tanabe, M. Notomi, S. Mitsugi, A. Shinya, and E. Kuramochi on APL 87 151112 (2005).

Continue reading »

Feb 27

This post originally appeared on CLEO 2011 by Frank Kuo and is reproduced with permission from its author.

Most people (well, let’s assume most people love physical science, especially light matter interaction) have a rough understanding about photonic crystals (PCs). To start with – photonic crystals (PCs) are periodic optical nanostructures that are designed to manipulate light. In general, to affect light’s propagation, the length of the repeating unit cell of the nanostructures in PCs is compatible to the wavelength of light. If you reach this far, you know quite a lot about PCs.

The next thing in our mind would be “where are the examples”!? If you follow scientific news closely, you might say – “Invisible cloak is made by PCs according to a BBC report or an article on science.” This is definitely true. However, there are a lot more applications based on PCs that are exciting and deserve us to take a detailed look. Furthermore, these applications are close to real world applications than you think!

Let us start with two-dimensional(2D) PCs. 2D PCs mean the unit cell is extending in two dimensions, just like the silicon slab shown in figure 1. In this case, we can picture the unit cell of the nanostructure is the air hole which extends in a plane. The light will be launched into the waveguide in the middle of the slab. Pioneered by Professor Susumu Noda (plenary speaker of CLEO 2011), this kind of silicon slab is a “light master”. By fine-tuning the air hole patterns, sizes and the positions, light with different frequencies will choose completely different routes when propagating in the waveguide through the slab. In general, the air hole size decides which frequency can leave the waveguide while the missing air holes (point defect) in the nanostructure determines where the light would be located and emitted. For example, the slab shown in figure 2 is an amazing design. It is a slab composed of seven PCs with different air hole sizes. In each PC, there is a point defect where three air holes are missing. Light with different frequencies chooses to leave the main highway (waveguide) and emits at different locations (point defect) as shown on the left of figure 2. The air hole has the size of about 400nm and the difference in air hole diameter of PC1 and PC7 is just 7 nm! These small structures and the differences in structures have huge effect on the light propagating.

Figure 1. A silicon 2D PC.

Figure 2. A seven-component 2D PC. Each PC is capable of selecting one frequency and emits it into the space. A mini-optical circuit indeed. Courtesy and copyright of B. Song, S, Noda, and T. Asano, Science 300 1537 (2003).

In addition to using the “point defect”, changing the hole sizes proves to be another neat way to localize the light, As shown in figure 3 (upper panel), the upper part of the slab is composed of air holes of diameter 410nm and 420nm, respectively. The difference is so small such that you can not tell easily even by a TEM image. If we launch the light through the lower waveguide, and scan the frequency of the laser, we found there is only one frequency that will hop into upper waveguide and be localized in a nanoscale volume (figure 3, lower panel). Furthermore, this method can select a very narrow bandwidth compared with the “point defect” method. As a result, it proves to have a much higher Q-factor in the localized cavity.

Figure 3. A highly selective 2D PC based on different air hole sizes. The inset on the lower panel shows the near field image of the dashed rectangle. Courtesy and copyright of B. Song, S. Noda, T. Asano, and Y. Akahane, Nature Materials 4 207 (2005).

Same idea can be applied to three dimensions. An interesting example is to suppress the spontaneous emission (SE) of a device (quantum well, for example). Modern techniques allow us to create a 3D PC such that certain frequencies of light cannot propagate in it. The set of the frequencies that are forbidden to propagate is called photonic bandgap (PBG). Now, if we embed a device into a 3D PC where the SE has the frequency in the PBG of this 3D PC, interesting things will happen. Since none of the accepting mode of the SE can exist or propagate in all directions, the emission lifetime is found to increase by several folds. Considering SE is not desirable in a laser system since it sets the threshold for the laser when it tries to lase and we cannot harvest the energy that is produced by SE in most cases, controlling the SE is indeed a great achievement.

Another nanostructure that is fascinating is a low dispersion optical fiber that can transport femtosecond light without adding too much dispersion. Creating a near chaos and/or random nanostructure such that no light frequency is resonant or interact constructively to it except propagating through the guided mode is the key. One example is shown in figure 4. An experiment shows that a 13 fs pulse only stretches to 26 fs when propagates in this fiber for a distance of 1 meter. This is a substantial improvement if we consider that normally a meter of fiber would stretch the pulse into ps regime. Maybe soon in the near future, we can transport ultra short pulse through fiber without stretching it!

I hope by now you have been fascinated by what PCs can do in advancing our technologies!

Figure 4. The fiber core of a low dispersion optical fiber. Notice the structure has no periodicity at all. Courtesy and copyright of J. Bethge, G. Steinmeyer, S. Burger, F. Lederer, R. Iliew, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 27, p. 1698 (2008).

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the Optical Society of America (OSA) or any OSA affiliate.
preload preload preload