Jan 27

Why a Temporal-Cloak is so Great: Uncovering the Hype

By JamesVanHowe Uncategorized No Comments »

From R. Boyd and Z. Shi,"News and Views" Nature, Jan 5, 2012, explaining temporal-cloaking

This post originally appeared on Jim’s CLEO Blog and is reproduced with permission from the author.

At Frontiers in Optics 2011 just this last October, Moti Fridman from Alex Gaeta’s group presented work on a the first experimental demonstration of temporal-cloaking using a time-lens system. The work was based upon a theoretical paper from Martin McCall et al in the February issue of the Journal of Optics, and at the beginning of this month, appeared in an in-depth treatment in the January 5, issue of Nature. Besides the usual barrage of bloggers latching onto science-fictionesque results of new research, time-cloaking was also written up in traditional news media such as the Christian Science Monitor.

Temporal-cloaking certainly sounds like something out of Star Trek, but what is it and why is it so great? What makes a temporal cloak truly exciting, and what a majority of the recent articles and posts fail to highlight, is that the temporal-cloak allows cloaking over an infinite section of space albeit for a finite duration of time.

Let’s imagine Harry Potter and his invisibility cloak. If the invisibility cloak is a temporal-cloak, Harry can move as far as he wants to the left-and-right and up-and-down without being seen for duration of the cloaking window. Harry can also move a little bit forward and backward without being seen, but not much or else he will walk out of the cloaking time-window (which is 50 ps for the Gaeta group’s work or about 1.0 cm in fiber). It is crucial that he is in the right place in the axial dimension (forward/backward) since the window occurs at a specific place in space, but he has total freedom in the transverse dimension for the duration of the cloak. Conceivably Harry could pull-off a bank robbery as long as the bank and the vault are inside that particular infinite pancake of cloaking window and within the duration of the window.

Contrast that to a spatial cloak which gives cloaking for an infinite amount of time, but only a finite section of space. If Harry has a spatial invisibility cloak, then he can stand in one spot for as long as he wants without being seen.

Finally, if Harry has a spatio-temporal cloak, conceivably he can maintain invisibility for any duration of time and throughout any volume of space.

The temporal-cloak shown by the Gaeta group is not a practical cloak. If you scrutinize the setup you’ll find that the way that they detect a cloaked event is through lack of nonlinear mixing. A nonlinear signal tells them the event is detected, and no signal tells them that the event is cloaked. You could just turn the power down to get the same result. They also couple into and out of the cloaking window with fiber-couplers between the cloaking apparatus. You can’t send both the signal and the event to be cloaked down the same fiber because if the “event” goes through the same time-lens system as the “signal” the event will appear superposed instead of cloaked. Basically they had to sneak it into the right spot at the right time along a different path of propagation.

However, the point of the work was not to show practical temporal cloaking for masking or encryption, but to show the very odd, very fundamental, and very cool phenomena of creating and tailoring gaps in time. So even if the temporal-cloak won’t be used anytime in the near future for cracking safes, it does bring the optics community closer to a true spatio-temporal invisibility cloak. It might be time to start brushing up on the rules of Quidditch.

Tagged with: • • •
Jan 09

The world’s smallest Stirling engine is powered by laser!

By Frank Kuo CLEO Conference, CLEO: Applications, Uncategorized No Comments »

This post originally appeared on CLEO BLOG by Frank Kuo and is reproduced with permission from its author.

Figure 1. The realization of the microscopic Stirling engine. Courtesy of V. Blickle and C. Bechinger in Nature Physics doi:10.1038/nphys2163 (2011).

When people mention the word “laser” to you, what is the first thing coming to your mind? Most of us associate lasers to their scary and destructive power, just like how we are educated in the Star Wars movie series. In reality, lasers can be quite gentle and perform very accurate and precise assignments, like micro-machining (Jim has a nice article about it). In fact, laser can be so gentle that researchers have used it to power the world’s smallest Stirling engine, which is composed of single tiny melamine bead (~ 3 um in diameter) in the water bath.

To realize how this ingenious microscopic engine works, we have to step into the phenomenon of optical trapping/tweezers first. Thanks to the detailed illustration on wiki, I can just summarize it in a few sentences — When the laser is tightly focused, or when it has the Gaussian beam intensity distribution, the tiny particle will be trapped in the focus or the center of the Gaussian beam, just like being trapped in a potential well. This is a result of momentum conservation. When the refracted light rays exit the particle, they exert momentum kicks to the particle, and the net result of these kicks is a force that traps the particle at the center of the focus. If the particle is in the focus, this force is zero. If the particle drifts away from the center, the kicks will be imbalanced and a net force will pull it back to the center. This particle behaves exactly like it is in a potential well. The steepness of the well depends on the laser intensity as you might guess it already. And our talented researchers use this technique to power the microscopic engine.

Here is how it goes. Figure 1 shows the comparison of a microscopic Stirling engine with a macroscopic one. As shown in step (1), the bead is trapped in a potential well by a focused laser beam. From step (1) to (2), the laser intensity is increased such that the bead would be confined in a smaller volume due to the steeper potential well. This is similar to moving a piston to squeeze the volume in the chamber. From (2) to (3), the water bath is heated by another NIR laser, and this step is similar to heating a macroscopic chamber. From step (3) to (4), the potential well is relaxed and the work is exerted from the bead to the surrounding, just like in macroscopic world, the gas is pushing the piston to exert work for useful application. From (4) to (1), the NIR laser is turned off, and the bead is cooled down, just like in the traditional Stirling engine, the gas is cooled back to the ambient temperature. Smart and elegant design, isn’t it?

Continue reading »

Tagged with: • •
Dec 13

Machining with Ultrafast Pulses

By JamesVanHowe CLEO: Applications No Comments »

(From Raydiance Inc)

This post originally appeared on Jim’s CLEO Blog and is reproduced with permission from the author.

As someone who has been trying to design novel ultrafast laser systems for the past eight years, my eyes were drawn to the title “Applications of Ultrafast Lasers” of Dr. Mike Mielke’s talk from Raydiance Inc. from the awesomely overwhelming list of invited speakers at CLEO 2012. Dr. Mielke’s talk is one of a handful in CLEO’s new Application and Technology conference which debuted last year in Baltimore in order to better bridge the gap between fundamental research and product commercialization.

To see what background information I could potentially find, I went to Raydiance’s website to find a wealth of information on micromachining and a host of video shorts of ultrafast laser micromachining in action. They are so pleasing to watch, I couldn’t help embedding many of them in this post.

Micromachinging with ultrafast lasers allows the removal of material without the introduction of heat (see the video above of laser micromachining on a match head without it igniting). Ultrafast lasers therefore give the advantages of laser machining- tailoring submicron features on the workpiece, without thermal collateral damage. For example, if you are going to have your dentist drill a tiny hole in one of your teeth (see the figure below) , you’d rather have her use the 350 fs laser shown in b) rather than 1.4 ns laser in a) in which the heat generated damages and fractures the tooth.

Drilling tooth enamel with a) 1.4 ns 30 J/cm2 laser pulses and b) with 350 fs 3 J/cm2 pulses. From B.C. Stuart et al, LLNL

This is because drilling with the femtosecond pulses relies on an entirely different physical process for removal of material than nanosecond pulses. For long pulses (> 100 ps), photons are absorbed by the material and converted into heat. This eventually fractures, melts, or vaporizes material at (and nearby) the laser focus. On the other hand, if the pulse is fast enough (< 1 ps), the material is removed solely by photo-ionization. Rather than dumping energy into the material, electrons of target molecules are stripped off by the intense electric field of the pulse. No absorption takes place and therefore no heat is generated.

Because the mechanism for material removal using ultrafast pulses does not depend on the material properties as it does for thermal ablation, such as the melting point, conceivably any material can be machined using ultrafast pulses. This has allowed Raydiance to micromachine polymeric materials for manufacturing next-generation vascular stents and microfluidic devices (see the videos below).

(From Raydiance Inc)……..for the full original post click here.

Tagged with: • • •
Nov 15

“Metamaterial tiles” are hot in many applications – including invisibility cloak!

By Frank Kuo CLEO Conference, CLEO: Applications No Comments »

This post originally appeared on CLEO BLOG by Frank Kuo and is reproduced with permission from its author.

Figure 1. An invisibility cloak made by a faceted dodecahedral. This simulation shows that the plane wave can propagate through it without too much distortion and objects can be hidden inside the dodecahedral. Courtesy of Oliver Paul, Yaroslav Urzhumov, Christoffer Elsen, David Smith, and Marco Rahm.

Various forms of metamaterial have generated a lot of scientific attention in the past few decades. Some exciting “potential” applications include the well-publicized invisibility cloak (Thanks to Harry Potter). As you may know already, metamaterial gains its bizarre optical property (such as negative index of refraction) by its internal composition or structure, rather than its original physical property. Most metamaterial has its magic only in specific wavelength region and this wavelength region is correlated to how small you can make the internal structures of the metamaterial. This is exactly why almost all the research on metamaterial focuses on THz region since THz has very long wavelength and we do not need to make the structures awfully small to concoct the magic (I did read some articles about “universal metamaterials”, but it seems a long way to go. Let’s dream of that coming in CLEO 2012).

Digging into more details, you can have 2D or 3D metamaterial depending on your applications. 2D metamaterial – or so called metamaterial tiles (m-tiles) – seems to make a huge leap in guiding the advance in the invisibility cloak and sensing platform. And they are easier to make (through the help of photo-lithography, or micro-machining on the surface). With this powerful combination, a booming in this field seems inevitable. Let us take a peek of its potential application in invisibility cloak first: Continue reading »

Tagged with: • •
Oct 22

Using Soda Cans to Beat the Diffraction Limit

By JamesVanHowe CLEO Conference No Comments »

Setup of the metalens (soda cans) used to focus a sound wave to a size of 1/25 th of the wavelength of the waves used to generate the beam. From PRL, 107, 64301.

This post originally appeared on Jim’s CLEO Blog and is reproduced with permission from the author.

Professor Mathias Fink from ESPCI ParisTech and Institut Langevin doesn’t fit the typical profile for a plenary speaker at an optics conference, which is precisely why why you won’t want to miss his plenary talk at CLEO 2012 this May. Though acoustics is the consistent medium for his work, his research more broadly consists of understanding the nature of waves and how to get around the limits assumed by our conventional understanding, such as diffraction-limited focusing and imaging. Much of professor Fink’s work since the late 1990′s has been using time-reversal, the subject of his upcoming plenary talk, to achieve these ends.

For example, in the August 5, 2011 issue of Physical Review Letters, Fink and collaborators demonstrated that they could focus a sound wave to 1/25 th of the wavelength of the waves used to create the focused beam. Ironically, this novel feat was obtained using very conventional objects- soda cans and computer speakers.

The MacGyveresque experiment shown in the figure above uses a grid of soda cans, a group of subwavelength acoustic resonators, to act as a “metalens“. When illuminated with a broadband field, this metalens allows subwavelength detail in the near-field to be encoded onto propagating waves. Essentially the metalens is a very good evanescent-to-propagating-wave converter, “unsticking” evanescent waves with subwavelength detail that are typically locked to the surface of the object (or source) of interest. This phenomenon is analogous to the generation of surface plasmons in near-field microscopy (see the August 16th post below). The propagating waves, now containing subwavelength information, can be detected in the far-field and time-reversed (essentially run backwards) in order to focus to subwavelength spots….(for the full original post click here)

 

Tagged with: • • •
Oct 03

Photonics for Global Health

By JamesVanHowe CLEO Conference, CLEO Tech Transfer, CLEO: Applications No Comments »

Left: Reflection images of a histopathology slide corresponding to skin tissue using a low-cost, portable, lens-free off-axis holographic microscope. Right: Conventional reflection-mode microscope image of the same specimen using a 4X objective lens (NA: 0.1). Image from Biomedical Optics Express.

This post originally appeared on Jim’s CLEO Blog and is reproduced with permission from the author.

Research performed in the Ozcan group at UCLA holds a unique place in the field of optics and photonics. Besides the typical pursuit of advancing optical technology, another major initiative of this photonics group is solving problems of global world health, particularly in resource-poor countries.

Early September marked a milestone for the UCLA group as they published work on a compact, low-cost (~$100 USD of parts), dual-mode microscope with 2 micron resolution in Biomedical Optics Express (also written up in a recent OSA press release). The key to making such a low-footprint, low-cost, lab-grade device is using holographic microscopy. The image information stored in a hologram (the interference of the reflected or transmitted light from the specimen with a reference beam) requires no lenses, drastically reducing the weight, size, and overall expense of the device. A computer reconstructs the wavefront reflecting from (or transmitting through) the sample instead of a lens (see fig below). The impact to world health will be increased blood-diagnostics, water quality tests, tissue screening and analysis, and other imaging diagnostics in areas where microscopes currently are not available due to cost and/or remoteness of location. Getting more microscopes into the hands of health workers may have large impacts for heading off disease outbreaks as well as treatments for individuals.

The idea of using holograms in microscopy is not new. In fact it was the quest for higher resolution in electron microscopy which prompted Dennis Gabor to devise wavefront reconstruction by holography in 1948. Gabor coined the word “hologram” which translates “whole message” to emphasize the amount of information that is stored in this very special interference pattern. For a brief history of holography from its roots in microscopy, its development through radar, and its boom in mainstream art and media in the 60′s and 70′s , see Jeff Hecht’s 2010 OPN article.

Schematic of the 200 gram microscope developed by the Ozcan group in reflection mode. LD: laser diode, PH: pin hole, BC: Beamsplitting Cube. Note the two AA batteries as the power source as well as for scale. Image from M. Lee, O. Yaglidere, and A. Ozcan, Biomedical Optics Express, 2, 2721 (2011).

What makes the Ozcan group’s work so special is not the use of a fundamentally new technique, but clever and impressive engineering. This holographic microscope is small, inexpensive, and can work in both transmission and reflection mode. The transmission mode of the current device is similar to an earlier work by the Ozcan group- a cell-phone microscope. In the summer of 2010, the UCLA group published work in Lab on a Chip demonstrating a clever attachment to an ordinary cell-phone which could convert it into lab-grade microscope (see the youtube short below). By employing digital holographic microscopy, the group was able to produce a 38 gram attachment without any lenses, lasers, or bulky optics, which when incorporated with the cell phone camera, produced hologram on the cell phone detector array. The idea is that the hologram data would be sent over the same cell phone to the closest hospital/analysis station, a computer would process the hologram to extract the image information, and then the image would be sent back to the same phone, all within seconds of placing the sample to be analyzed into the device.

Though the current device cannot be so easily integrated onto a phone, the additional benefit of reflection-mode operation makes up for its “bulkiness.” By operating in reflection-mode, the new microscope is additionally suited for imaging optically dense media like tissue, something not possible using in-line transmission holography due to spatial distortions in the reference wave…  To read the full original post, click here.

Tagged with: • • •
Sep 10

Zoo of super resolution microscopy.

By Frank Kuo Uncategorized No Comments »

This post originally appeared on CLEO BLOG by Frank Kuo and is reproduced with permission from its author.

Microscope, one of the most popular optical instruments, has been paving the way of biological science for the past three hundred years. With the aid of the microscope, detailed observations of sub-cell size resolution were made possible. This, in turn, accelerated our understanding of the biology in an unprecedented way. Three hundred years have passed; we now arrived at a new cross road — While triumphing on the universe of biology, a desire to develop microscopes with specificities and better resolutions is creating another revolution.

Specificities problems are less optical relevant. It is like painting different organelles of the cell with different colors. To do so, scientists use fluorescent dyes to attach to different organelles or encode them directly into the genetic codes of the proteins. So we can differentiate what they are and where they are. Scientists are quite good in doing so.

Resolution is another story. It is a barrier imposed by fundamental physics. In other words, the enemy of a microscope is diffraction, which prevents how well you can resolve two points on the focal plane. Same principle also applies to how tight you can focus a collimated beam. Using the traditional microscope, you cannot have resolution better than hundreds of nanometers if visible light is used. The axial resolution is not much better. As a result, no matter how small the particle in the focal plane is (in this case, the fluorescent dye), you would always observe a blob with some sizable volume. How do achieve better resolution? What kind of tricks scientists can play to break the diffraction limit?

For me, the first milestone in super resolution is called FIONA (Fluorescence Imaging with One Nanometer Accuracy). What a lovely name! In a nutshell, it fits the fluorescent signal with a Gaussian function. By doing so, it finds the center of the dye theoretically. Just like finding a center of the blob in the example we gave above. This method is generally adopted in modern microscopy since it localizes the location of the dye in the lateral plane quite well. There is a caveat though — you cannot have too many dyes in focal point. This is just going to screw up your fitting.

Same mathematical manipulation does not work satisfactory in axial direction. In addition to multi-photon microscopy which aims on attacking this problem, there are other neat techniques existent. The way to get around it is modifying and mixing the experimental setup with other optical phenomena. The most eye-catching technique to me is the research led by professor H. Hess in HHMI. By putting a three-way beam splitter, the florescent signal from the dye in the focal plane would interfere with itself and generate different interference pattern depending on how far the dye is offset from the true focal point. This method achieved tens of nm of axial resolution. What impresses me the most is the feeling I have when trying to understand the diagram of the experimental layout. Suddenly, you realize, the imagination to advance optical science is unlimited.

Figure 1. The optical layout for interference microscopy. Courtesy of G. Shtengel, et al. in PNAS 106 9 3125 (2009)

Continue reading »

Tagged with: • •
Aug 17

Year of the Plasmon

By JamesVanHowe CLEO Conference, CLEO: Applications, QELS Conference No Comments »

Sketch of Edward Synge's proposed near-field microscope. The red dot denotes the gold nanoparticle. Picture from L. Novotny, Phys. Today, 64, 47 (2011).

This post originally appeared on Jim’s CLEO Blog and is reproduced with permission from the author.

This year may not be a flush for the market but it is looking good for plasmonics. Expansion of the the work shown in CLEO 2011, Postdeadline paper “Nanoantenna-enhanced gas sensing in a single tailored nanofocus,” from Na Liu et al. just took the August cover of Nature Materials. Additionally, plasmonics has had a solid recent run of the main-stream physics circuit after the publication of two Physics Today articles earlier this year in February and July.

The July issue of Physics Today features an article by Lukas Novotny from University of Rochester in which he reviews near-field optics, the broader category where plasmonics resides. Earlier in the year, Mark Stockman of Georgia State University wrote a very accessible and informative article on nanoplasmonics that took the cover of the February issue of Physics Today. The cover shows a 13th century stained glass window of Sainte Chappelle in Paris whose yellow and red brilliance are assumed to come from nanoplasmonic resonances of silver and gold nanoparticles in the glass. The optical effect of how the red changes over the length of the window is said to have purposely been designed to mimic the flowing blood of Christ.

Novotny’s July article also offers a romantic insight into the history of near-field optics and plasmonics. Novotny, recounts how in 1928, Edward Synge wrote a “prophetic letter” to Einstein proposing a near-field microscope (see Figure above) to optically image a biological sample below the diffraction limit. Synge’s proposed microscope, which could not be realized until 1982 (by Dieter Phol’s group at IBM of Switzerland), looks eerily familiar to current techniques used for the development of plasmonic devices and sensing- the use of metallic nanoparticles to generate surface plasmons in order to enhance a probing optical field. The two Physics Today articles are must-reads for those who need a crash-course on plasmonics.

A plasmon is created when the electrons on a metal surface are periodically displaced with respect to the lattice ions by an external, driving, optical field, creating an “electron oscillator”… for the full post click here.

Tagged with: • • • •
Jul 30

Evolution, the master of optical science!

By Frank Kuo Uncategorized No Comments »

This post originally appeared on CLEO BLOG by Frank Kuo and is reproduced with permission from its author.

Do not get me wrong; evolution is an expert of all physical science. But it intimately links nature to optical science without doubt — from cyanobacteria that have been converting solar energy to chemical energy for 3 billion years to human beings who rely on vision for surviving.

Neuroscience indicates that about 25%~ 50% of the brainpower and as many as 30 different areas of the brain are devoted to vision processing. This simply means that each human being is hard wired as an optical scientist, although we hardly recognize this. Over the past millions of years, evolution has perfected our imaging device in a subtle way. Recently, a report on Biomedical Optics Express shows for the first time the eyes’ imaging sensors — cones and rods by using adaptive optics to minimize the aberration caused by the eye structure. As shown in the figure 1, cones, the round structures, create red, green, and blue perception of colors. There are about 6-7 millions of them, concentrated at the center of the retina — forvea. A friendly and easy to digest article about this topic can be found here.

Continue reading »

Tagged with: • • • •
Jul 14

Are we Entering a Solar Boom?

By JamesVanHowe Uncategorized 1 Comment »

First Solar employees working on the 21 MW solar power station in Blythe, CA in the Mojave Desert. The project was completed in December 2009. Photo from cnet News; originally from First Solar. First Solar just received $4.5 billion in DOE loans to build three new stations in the Mojave Desert whose total output will be 1.33 GW

This post originally appeared on Jim’s CLEO Blog and is reproduced with permission from the author.

This summer seems to be marked by a frenzy of solar energy initiatives and development. The Business News section in the May issue of Nature Photonics reported on four recent major investments in solar technology manufacturing: JA Solar of Shanghai plans to build a 3 GW capacity plant in Hefei, China for the manufacturing of monocrystalline silicon solar cells. Investors have pledged $2.05 billion over the next four years, and production is slated to begin in 2012. Polysilicon Technology Company, a joint venture between Mutajadedah Energy of Saudi Arabia, and KCC Corporation of Seoul will build a $1.5 billion facility to produce solar-grade polysilicon in Jubail, Saudi Arabia by 2017. The Indian government is discussing a joint venture with nanotech company, Rusanano, of Moscow to obtain a consistent supply of silicon for Indian photovoltaic manufacturers with hopes of obtaining 2,000 tons of silicon ingots for solar cell production. And SoloPower of San Jose was guaranteed $197 million from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to build a plant in Oregon for the manufacturing of flexible copper-indium-gallium diselenide (CIGS) for light-weight solar panels.

The DOE made even bigger news for solar energy investment, however, at the end of June when it promised $4.5 billion for the construction of three different California photovoltaic power plants: Antelope Valley Solar Ranch 1, the Desert Sunlight Project, and the Topaz Solar Project. Arizona-based company First Solar, Inc will sponsor all three projects, constructing each solar array with cadmium telluride (CdTe), thin-film photovoltaic modules. Together, the new power plants will provide 1.33 GW (powering the equivalent 275,000 U.S. homes) and offset the generation of 1.8 megatons of carbon dioxide. As described by Alexis Madrigal, author of “Powering the Dream: The History and Promise of Green Technology,” (Da Capo Press, 2011), in a June 17, interview on NPR’s Science Friday, the Mojave Desert solar plants will prove to be particularly effective when compared to other green initiatives. One reason for their effectiveness is their location- the solar plants will be simultaneously near large population centers, L.A. and Las Vegas, with ideal conditions for sunshine- the desert. This is in contrast to wind energy where ideal locations for wind farms often correspond to areas with low population densities (like the plains of North Dakota) and so power distribution becomes an issue. Additionally, the sunlight in the desert suits itself to matching peak output of the solar grid with peak usage- as everyone cranks up the air conditioning at the hottest time of the day, the PV modules are cranking out the most amps.

Time-line of photovoltaic efficiencies for various cell types; from the National Renewable Energy Lab

The choice of thin-film CdTe for the solar cells is once again due to balancing cost and efficiency. First Solar claims that its CdTe modules have the smallest carbon footprint (this includes fabrication and recycling of the module over its lifetime) compared to any photovoltaic on the market, as well as the fastest energy payback time (EPBT). They also note that the high temperature coefficient of CdTe allows their modules to perform better than silicon at higher temperatures, which will obviously be crucial given the heat conditions of the Mojave.

Other summer solar news include McGraw-Hill’s June 13, announcement to build the world’s largest private solar plant at its East Windsor, New Jersey campus. Though New Jersey is not as sunny as the Mojave Desert, the plant is slated to generate an impressive14 MW.

A detailed solar map was released by the City University of New York on June 16, which shows the solar energy production potential of New York City’s rooftops. The New York Times reported that the solar map, made by making LIDAR sweeps the previous year, shows that two-thirds of the New York’s rooftops have great potential for solar harvesting. If these rooftops were covered with solar panels, the city could use them to meet half of its electrical power consumption needs, even at peak use.

NYC roofs were not the only ones in the solar lime-light recently. Google announced on June 14, a partnership with SolarCity in which they will provide a $280 million fund to help finance SolarCity’s solar panel leasing program for rooftops across the U.S.   …For the full original post, click here.

Tagged with: • •
Previous Entries
preload preload preload